Non- Violent philosophy is curse for Hindus
Most of the Muslims are violent people while Hindus are non-violent people.
Nonviolence" towards the people who are "violent" is a contribution towards VIOLENCE.
"Sarva Dharm Sam bhav " who believe in "EK DHARM SAM BHAV" and that is mine one only----is not a contribution towards "SARV DHARM SAM BHAV""Tolerance"of those who are "intolerant" of every other religionists is not contribution towards TOLERANCE.
Have they ever sung "ISHWAR ALLAH TERO NAM " in Masjids? Or secular people want Hindus only to give concessions to Muslims? all the time.
Hindus should be a realist not a dreamer?
Your daughters and sisters even if raped by-------------- and you want to talk of Aman / Shanti with them? Peace with those? All Hindus have been thrown out of Pakistan .
WHAT IS the AMAN / SHANTI of Muslims doing in Pakistan ? People who give advise to Hindus to be non-violent should GO TO PAKISTAN and BANGLA DESH and hold the dialogue there with Muslims. Non violence is needed in Muslim countries not in Bharat and other secular and democratic countries.
The over dose of nonviolence and peace slogans have destroyed Bhaarat first by Buddha and as a result we lost Sindh in 712 A.D. to MOHAMMAD BIN KASIM because Buddhists collaborated with invading Islamic forces against Hindus.
Hindu king Dhir whose daughters were taken to Baghdad were their hairs were tied to the tail of horses and horses were made to run until these princesses were dead and rest of history as we know was the worst for Hindus and we are still paying the price in blood, death, assassinations, kidnap, rape, torture, highjaking, betrayals, sabotage, cheating, humiliation and conversion by Muslims.
Gandhi has been made famous for non-violence but he supported the violence of Muslims.
Gandhi who evaded the truth!
Gandhi who broke the vow taken with God as witness!
On 22nd August 1906, the South African Government of Transvaal issued an ordinance stating that every Hindu, Arab and Turkish individual above the age of 8 years should submit the details of identification marks, finger imprints and name, in order to acquire a certificate.
On 12th September Gandhi passed a resolution against this act in a meeting attended by nearly 3000 representatives. All the 3000 representatives vowed to oppose the ordinance with God as witness. Gandhi condemned the ten fingerprints' permit so vehemently that people felt ashamed to acquire the permit openly.
This agitation continued till Jan 1908. Gandhi was arrested and released in the meantime. Eventually he came to a compromise with General Smuts who agreed to the ten fingerprints. Later in a meeting of Hindu representatives he explained the points of compromise to them.
One of the Pathans (who had also taken the vow) pinpointed the contradictions in Gandhi's words and deeds and asked, "How can you ask us to break a vow we have taken?" As usual Gandhi played upon his words and avoided answering him directly. Hence when Gandhi was going to give his fingerprints, a Pathan named Mir Alam attacked him.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha; vol-1 author- Arun Sarathi )
Gandhi murdered truth for own publicity!
Riots broke loose at Delhi , Punjab , Ahemdabad and Kheda because of the Rowlatt movement. As the rumor of Anusuyaben Sarabhai's arrest spread, riots took place in Ahemdabad.
There were riots in Punjab because of Dr. Kichlu and Dr. Satyapal's arrest.
There was firing in Delhi ; yet Gandhi was not arrested.
Even then his letters and communications during that period, state that riots took place because he was arrested.
To gain popularity Gandhi turned and twisted the truth.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha Vol-1; author- Arun Sarathi )
Gandhi who did not live up to the promises made during the Khilafat Movement!
During the Khilafat movement Gandhi had promised, "As long as my Muslim friends behave with restraint in acquiring their legal demands and till I believe that they do not wish tyranny, I will cooperate with them. The moment they become violent I will stop assisting them and will tell not every Hindu but all other individuals to stop assisting them."
Later on, during the non-cooperation movement, the Mopla Muslims in Malabar revolted and committed atrocities on the Hindus on a very large scale. As promised by Gandhi to the nation, it was expected that he would sever all connections with the non-cooperation movement and guide others also to follow suit; but Gandhi (who was loyal to truth?) broke his promise by doing nothing that was expected of him.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha Vol-1; author- Arun Sarathi)
Gandhi resorted to untruth to flatter the Muslims!
During the commotion which ensued the Khilafat movement, the atmosphere turned violent.
At this juncture a deputy commissioner named Willowby was murdered. Maulana Abdul Bari and Shaukat Ali spoke objectionably against this incident at a public meeting held in Lucknow .
Under this pretext the Christian barrister Mr. Douglas backed out from the task of assisting the non-cooperation movement. After this incident, Gandhi commented in the Issues of the newspaper 'Young India ' and ' Nav jeevan' of 3 Nov'1920 that the news about Mr. Douglas withdrawing from the movement due to the objectionable statements of Bari and Ali was baseless. This was an utterly untruthful explanation given by Gandhi, similar to the politicians of today.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha Vol-2; author- Arun Sarathi)
Gandhi who forced non-cooperation upon the nation, through falsehood!
In the Congress session at Calcutta out of the 5000 representatives, 1855 representatives voted for and 873 representatives voted against the Non-cooperation movement, while 2200 of them did not arrive at any decision. Senior national leaders like Bipinchandra Pal, Chittaranjan Das , Barrister Jinnah, Mrs. Annie Besant had opposed this resolution.
Only the Ali brothers and Motilal Nehru supported Gandhi. Even so, in the Issue of 'Young India ', Gandhi wrote, "The analysis of the votes makes it evident that the nation is in favour of non-cooperation." Thus he evaded the truth.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha Vol-2; author- Arun Sarathi)
Gandhi treads upon the truth in order to acquire power!
After getting hold over the Congress in 1920, Gandhi tried to bring under control its other branches. Gandhi became the President of 'Home Rule League' after Annie Besant resigned. After renaming it as 'Swarajya Sabha' when Gandhi called for an emergency meeting to reform its constitution, only 61 members attended it. The resolution of reforms was passed after 43 members voted for and 18 voted against it. Jinnah stressed that two-third majority was needed in order to pass the resolution. When Gandhi rejected this plea, Jinnah resigned. Behaving in accordance with the proverb 'All is fair in politics' and going against the constitution, Gandhi once again evaded the truth.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha Vol-2; author- Arun Sarathi)
Gandhi's contradictions regarding truth!
1. Pandit. Madan Mohan Malviya wired to Gandhi from England to oppose the arrival of the Prince of England and his participation in the round table conference. Jamanadas, Dwarkadas and Kunjuru too met Gandhi at Sabarmati regarding the same issue. At that time Jinnah and Barrister. Jaykar were also present. Gandhi later went back on the assurance he had given during that meeting.
2. In a letter addressed to Gandhi on 18 March 1947 Nirmalkumar wrote, "In your case I have observed that when discussion related to your close associates commences, instead of giving priority to the truth you tend to be partial to them."
From all the exposition above you must have realised that 'Truth' was what only Gandhi thought. Gandhi's conception of truth had reached a state of decline, hence many a time he turned away from his words; many a time he modified his statements and upheld his decisions and actions.
(Ref- Shodh Mahatma Gandhincha Vol-2; author- Arun Sarathi )
The Mahatma who failed to understand the truth!
Gandhi said, "God is truth." which is acceptable but what exactly is the truth?
Is it that which is beyond one's understanding? Truth is that which Gandhi always failed to understand. (Ref- Gurudev Kateswamiji in Ghangarjit, April 2005)
================================
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It would be nice if you can substantiate your claims with historic references i.e. recorded history. The article is full of hatred towards other religion and ethnicities. From my experience the Muslims in India or Pakistan or Hindus in India or Pakistan are oppressed as much - having same problems link to food, clothing and shelter.
Post a Comment